Aylesbury Magistrates Court No.3. 26/4/13. Regina v Colin Deryck Jarvis.

FAO: PFC Ivey & PFC Jennings. Apologies for the hilariously DUFF pic taken of you by the courtroom convict - sorry I mean - by the defendant. The lense of my phone camera was OBVIOUSLY EXACTLY LIKE the courtroom HANDS of Regina's ONLY witness i.e. DIRTY!

I want to openly acknowledge and thank two good and true friends of mine, to whom I am indebted.
 
Aylesbury Magistrates Court No.3. 26/4/13. Regina v Colin Deryck Jarvis.

Jason Jennings - Llanddewi Brefi Ceredigion & Jarratt Jonathan Ivey - Aylesbury Buckinghamshire attended court on my behalf from 09:15 until 15:30. Two true friends. Both of whom are moral, good, decent and honest men.

Neither defence witness was called to give evidence under oath because of the shortcomings and, I would argue, the negligence of the CPS who are the party responsible for bringing me, a totally innocent man, to criminal prosecution at trial.

The CPS's prosecution of me was mucked and rescheduled for 25/6/13 @ Milton Keynes Magistrates Court.

Because of, what can fairly be described as the unprofessional incompetence and lack of due diligence on the part of the CPS and HMCTS listings dept. and through absolutely no fault of ours - the defence team - I am required to impose upon and to inconvenience Jason and Jon for a second time to appear as defence witnesses before Milton Keynes Magistrates Court when the CPS's unconscionable, ill conceived and wholly ill judge prosecution of me recommences in two months time.

Jon, Jason, thank you for standing up next to me and alongside me in my fight to defend myself and uphold my right of: Honest comment, fair comment, free speech and freedom of expression in relation to ALL of the TRUE FACTUAL and ACCURATE content posted within my public social media websites in relation to: BT Group & the Communication Workers Union and the numerous sad, dishonest, deceitful, mendacious, wicked and Godless workplace / trade union place bullies and harassing cowards - identifying applicable BT employees (management operatives & field team operatives) and/or TU officials/members - therein.

Jason, Jon - I owe you both a debt of gratitude.

p.s. Jon, thanks for the excellent, very enjoyable Thursday evening pre-trial social.(...me belly full man!)

rough first draft: Aylesbury Magistrates Court (i.e. a public courtroom) Regina vs Colin Deryck Jarvis 26/4/13.

Synopsis

a) Me, Jason and Jon in the courthouse for 9:15

b) All meetings with my Solicitor concluded by 11:15

c) (i) At about 11:15 my Solicitor meets with me to tell me that the CPS are alleging that I have breached existing court bail conditions. The CPS citing the contents of a social media post that I had sent into the "www Cloud" that morning at 8:45 (before we left for court). Apparently somebody(s) - presumably and hypothetically - a big BNP Nick-racist-retard-twat-Griffin fan(s) and supporter(s) connected with the CPS's prosecution of me - had been desperately skulking, snivelling and scavenging, like a cornered mongrel dog through my social media sites from a secret location, and was upset (ahhh...) at reading a christian and surname contained therein and went crying, pleading and bleating to the CPS '...bowt it!(sic). 

Why anybody connected with the CPS's criminal prosecution of me felt the need to seek out my social media public websites - on that morning I have no idea. But I do know that my Solicitor served on the CSP the names of the two witnesses for the defence - on that morning. 

Coincidence? Hmmm...

c) (ii) I said to my Solicitor that that CPS allegation is complete bollocks. That I have NOT breached the court bail conditions relating to the offence for which I am being tried today and for which exact bail conditions were served on me on 25 January 2013. All of which I have complied with to the letter. [(for light relief, a made up jest) - ...Solicitor then said '...have you brought an overnight bag to court? - (end of jest) ]

c) (iii) Further discussion was had with my Solicitor, before he saying ...be ready to go in. I then spoke to Jason and Jon before being summoned into court No.3 at about 12:00 p.m.

d) On taking my seat next to my Solicitor I saw that there were members of the public in court, either neutral to or to supporting the CPS's case against me, observing the UK criminal justice system being administered in prosecuting me, the British black man who is the defendant at Trial.
I myself went to court with my two witnesses - Mr J. Ivey and Mr J. Jennings - only and with no family members or friends as members of the public in court.

2Bcontd...

17/5/13 

e) The case commenced with the Justices' Clerk verifying in law whether the case against me could be heard, as the allegations against me date from Feb. 2006 and span the period to Jan. 2013. There being a cut off period of six months beyond which the separation of the alleged criminal conduct cannot be considered connected, or a continuous act, or a course of conduct etc. 

Their Worships were informed by the Justices' Clerk that the case could be heard as the last allegation falls well within the six months cut off period - because - the CPS assert that their "six page" Witness statement (of the 3/12/12* - please note!) that was made to Thames Valley Police  by ***** *****, which is the CPS's evidence at Trial, contains allegations of harassment which cites the defendant's social media contents dated as recently as Dec. 2012.

f) The CPS then commences to present their opening argument to their Worships. The CPS basically outlined the allegations, the context of the allegations and what the CPS assert are the historic and contemporaneous background to the allegations of criminal harassment carried out against the Crown's witness. Including, the CPS presenting, briefly, the responses of the defendant when interviewed under caution by the investigating police officers on 10/01/13. The CPS's opening remarks to the Magistrates' Bench lasted approx. 10 min.

g) The CPS then indicated to their Worships that the Crown would like to put the CPS's evidence to, and to ask questions of the Crown's witness. The Magistrates then turned their attention to the defendant and my Solicitor. The Magistrate told me that the CPS had requested and had been granted special measures in relation to the ccircumstances under which Crowm's witness is prepared to give vebal evidence in person under oath in a public court. 

 The Magistrate informed me and my Solicitor that the Crown's witness was only willing to give his evidence in a public court on behalf of himself and on behalf of the State's prosecuting authority if I - the defendant - were not able to look at him doing it. If I were prevented from looking at him giving his so-called "evidence". 

N.B. Talk about surreal, disturbing, bizarre and strange behaviour in the Crown's only witness requesting evidence-giving "special measures" in a public court. "Special measures" that are put in place: For a child under 17. Or for a victim of a sexual offense. Or for a person with communication difficulties. Or for a vulnerable or intimidated person. Or for a person with significant impairment of intelligence and social functioning. Or for a person who suffers from a mental disorder - as defined by the Mental Health Act 1983. 

And now, apparently, those same "special measures" are also put in place for a six foot two, 48 y/o "substantive C1 grade BT IT Gold User team leader supervisor" current white BT employee of 20+ years employment, who considered himself to be a law unto himself inside that white employer's workplace environment.

[Mmmm, yeeeeeeessss! Very strange, very bizarre and so so very pathetic behaviour - indeed. My my my, how far the once mighty seem to have fallen!]

h) However, I was ordered to leave the court and go into another room and to close the door behind me. I did this. Some moments later I was called back into court and took my seat next to my Solicitor, my view of the witness box and it's occupant was now blocked by a screen partition. 

i) Their Worships, the Justices' Clerk, the court usher, the CPS prosecutor and my Solicitor all had sight of the CPS's witness who occupied the witness box. 

j) The court then heard the Crown's witness take the oath on the Holy Bible, after which the CPS prosecutor asked questions of the Crown's witness for 25 minutes maximum. Following which the court adjourned for lunch until 13:45. 

k) The actual content of the evidence given by the Crown's witness in public court in response to being questioned by the Crown prosecutor will be described later within this post.

l) The court reconvened at 14:00 and I was again ordered to remove myself from the court whilst the Crown's witness re-entered the witness box hidden behind a sight blocking partition. After whch I was called back into court and took my seat next to my legal representative, looking forward to my Solicitor's cross examination of the Crown's witness in relation to the seven consecutive years of criminal harassment he alleges has been conducted against him by that Solicitor's client, Colin Jarvis.   

 Okay so far? Goodie good. 

2Bcontd...

FAO: PFC JENNINGS & PFC IVEY.

Regina vs Colin Deryck Jarvis. 26/4/13.

Apologies for the hilariously DUFF pic taken of you by the courtroom convict - sorry I mean - by the defendant. The lense of my phone camera was OBVIOUSLY EXACTLY LIKE the courtroom HANDS of Regina's ONLY witness i.e. DIRTY!

Re: Regina v Colin Jarvis A Personal Statement. [aka …a tirade (sic) CPS 26/4/13]

Re: Regina v Colin Jarvis

A Personal Statement.

[aka …a tirade (sic) CPS 26/4/13]

I believe my social media sites content to be lawful, legal, legitimate accurate and factual information postings. I refute the assertion of any criminal harassment of any other person or entity.

The entirity of my social media content is: Honest comment, fair comment, fair opinion and the exercise of my freedom of expression as described within Article 10 of the ECHR.

It should be noted that my fair opinion and comment, my honest comment, honestly held and honestly expressed in respect of my social media websites are posted without malice toward any individual or entity. 

Rather all my social media content are based upon and supported by true facts, accurate and precise fact which I post with full justification and with full and sufficient clarity in respect of black BT employees and/or CWU members and white BT employees and/or CWU members, all of whom have been instrumental in and fundamentally involved in consistently and constantly pursuing a discriminatory, harassing, victimising, harmful, distressful, alarming and damaging course of conduct toward me within BTs workplace over the period of time stated within all of my social media websites.

I have indicated and identified the subject matter with sufficient clarity throughout the entirety of my social media content and postings. That fact is, I would argue, indisputable and made demonstrably clear within all of my public websites.

I choosing to use the right of every citizen to be offensive towards, to be insulting towards and to heap abusive opprobrium upon numerous black persons and white persons within BT and the CWU is not and cannot be believed to amount to a course of conduct amounting to criminal harassment. 

I believe that expressing offensive, abusive, insulting honest comment, honestly held by me, about the unlawful BT & CWU workplace conduct of persons known to me does not constitute criminal conduct of harassment contrary to the PHA. 

Rather, that in respect of all of my social media content …I believe that in the particular circumstances my pursuit of the course of conduct to be reasonable.  

The fact that another black person(s) or another white person(s) considers my honestly held honest comment to be objectionable and offensive does not / cannot amount to a course of conduct of criminal harassment. 

I am presumed to have the legal right and freedom of any British citizen to express, without malice, honest comment, honestly held about black people and about white people within BT and within the CWU. 

I have exercised that legal right and will continue to so do - within my social media websites. 

As a defendant in criminal proceedings I assert, for the CPS to prosecute me for pursuing a reasonable course of conduct is unconscionable. The CPS’s case against me asserting criminal harassment has no merit, absolutely without merit, lacks any merit and should, the defendant would argue, be treated as such by a court.

I consider the CPS are attempting to interfere with my right of freedom of expression and are seeking restrict my right of freedom of expression and my right to free speech, wholly unjustifiably. My honest comment does not target a particular racial or ethnic group, therefore no interference by the CPS or the court is justified in interfering with and restricting my right to freedom of expression. 

The exact same right possessed by the numerous black persons and white persons whom I have lawfully, legally, legitimately and justifiably identified and cited by their known bad reputation, by their known bad character and by their known  (recorded and documented)  unacceptable and reprehensible BT & CWU workplace conduct. Maliciously, wilfully and purposely perpetrated against me - Colin Jarvis - by those numbers of black persons and white persons who are BT employees and CWU members, as described within my social media websites content. (end of  ...tirade!) 

2Bcontd...(for now!)

GULLIBLE, IN DENIAL, DELUSIONAL COWARD JOHN COFFEY.

FYI - TO DISPEL OTHER 'PERSON'(S) VERBAL DIARRHOEA BULLSHIT, DRIBBLED OUT BY THAT 'PERSON'(S) INTO 'EVIDENCE' WITHIN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ME.

AT NO STAGE - FROM 7 JULY 2011 TO 6 APRIL 2013 - AT NO STAGE HAVE I, COLIN JARVIS - EVER, REPEATED FOR CLARITY - HAVE I EVER EVER PRESENTED TO...
(a) BT GROUP PLC SENIOR AND/OR VERY SENIOR MANAGEMENT.
(b) BT LEGAL.
(c) READING ET EMPLOYMENT JUDGES.
(d) AYLESBURY THAMES VALLY POLICE.
(e) THE CPS.
(f) THE DEFENCE SOLICITOR
...THAT I ASSERT ANY BME AND/OR NONE BME BT EMPLOYEE WHO, WITH MALICE AFORETHOUGHT, CHOSE TO DELIBERATELY SUBMIT LIES AND DISHONEST, MISLEADING, WICKED, FALSE, UNTRUE, EVIL AND MADE-UP VERBAL AND/OR WRITTEN EVIDENCE TO BT MANAGEMENT(HA!) DID SO -
...IN ORDER TO STICK UP FOR BT OVER HIM (SIC).

NOWHERE REPEAT NOWHERE HAVE I EVER EVER STATED SUCH A THING. AND - DAT'S DA TROOT ROOT! (geddit, john bwoy !)

IT IS SIMPLY A PROVABLE FACT THAT I ASSERTED - NO SUCH THING !!!
I AM EASILY ABLE TO PROVE THAT FACT WITH SUBSTANTIAL QUANTITIES OF HARD COPY BT DOCUMENTS c. 2011 TO 2013. A GREAT DEAL OF THOSE DOCUMENTS ARE CURRENTLY POSTED ON ALL MY SOCIAL MEDIA SITES AND HAVE BEEN FOR SOME CONSIDERABLE TIME.

IN OTHER WORDS WILL CPS WITNESS(S) PLEASE SHOW EVERYBODY, POINT OUT TO EVERYBODY - TO THE COURT TO FAMILY & TO FRIENDS (and to your massas) - EXACTLY WHERE COLIN JARVIS HAS EVER STATED...
...HE (utp) / THEY (phil the nigger[sic] lfoulkes, kbenwell-andhisson-thorp, macdonald, grundy, et al) ...LIED...IN ORDER TO STICK UP FOR BT OVER HIM. (SIC)

P.S.. re: 01/03/13 COURT DOCS. disclosed to me on 5/4/13 by the CPS. - I DON'T "...FEEL THAT YOU LIED..." (SIC)
I KNOW FOR A FACT YOU - UTP - LIED.
HOW?
BECAUSE I CAN READ BT DOCUMENTS IN MY POSSESSION.
ANYBODY WHO READS WIKILEAKS WILL ALSO BE ABLE TO KNOW THE SAME FACTS, EVENTUALLY!

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONSULT ALL RELEVANT SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS ON MY PUBLIC WEBSITES FOR CONFIRMATION OF EXACTLY WHAT I PRESENTED IN EVIDENCE TO BT, TO THE CWU, TO READING EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL.. ET AL XXX

IPSO FACTO -

FOR ANY BME AND/OR NONE BME BT EMPLOYEE 'PERSON' AND/OR 'PERSONS' TO PRESENT - INTO CRIMINAL EVIDENCE WITHIN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST ME - THAT DESPERATE STUPIDITY OF..

..IN ORDER TO STICK UP FOR BT OVER HIM (SIC).... ARE SIMPLY - A 'PERSON' / 'PERSONS' OF CRASS STUPIDITY. JAW DROPPING, THICKO, CRASS COWARDLY STUPIDITY. A 'PERON'(S) WHO IS FUCKING DELUSIONAL AND A SAD COWARD. OKAY!

[lee foulkes, steve halsey, phil the nigger (sic), paula allington, dominc martello, danny thorp, keith benwell, phil galaty, andrew poozicKA, BNP's cousin andy in MTW + other TEC bods & Co. must be laughing their little nuts off at the film 'The Green Mile' and the backward, overgrown, halfwit simpleton JOHN COFFEY the black moronic cretin character portrayed in the film.]

...ramble ramble...puff puff, quick where's me cannabis... XXX
2Bcontd...

My allotment plot tenancy. c. Aug 2006

1) For the sake of clarity and for the avoidance of doubt - in respect of Aylesbury Thames Valley Police re: the contents of their 14/2/13 witness statement included within CPS evidential bundle disclosed to me 5/4/13 as evidence that is to be presented against me within criminal proceedings on 25/6/13 - circumstances dictates and demands that I...

2) For the sake of for any innocent and/or blamelessly, ignorant, visitors to my blog - circumstances dictates and demands that I...  

3) For the sake of my dignity and self respect in and for myself as a honest, truthful and innocent black man who is being unconscionably prosecuted by the CPS. For the sake of my dignity in and my respect for people of my race and for people of a race different from my own, circumstances dictates and demands that I...

& finally

4) Necessity & the avoidance of doubt dictates and demands that I... put to bed and nail - once and for all - the bullshit, the desperate, stupid bullshit which are the untrue and false assertions made by CPS witnesses in the CPSs criminal prosecution of me c.26/04/13 & c.25/6/13. And instead describe - the true, the actual and the factual circumstances surrounding my legitimate, lawful and legal acquisition of an allotment plot tenancy from Aylesbury Vale District Council c.Aug.2006.

Preface: I first went onto Bierton Rd allotment site in the Summer (Aug. I think) of 2001 at the invite of a BT employee "substantive C1 grade BT IT Gold User team leader supervisor", under who's authority, control and power I and other BT employees were contractually obligated to work. That BT employee "substantive C1 grade BT IT Gold User team leader supervisor" having very recently moved into a HP20 residence c.2000 and then acquired No.13 plot tenancy from AVDC. The No.13 plot being then (c.Aug.2001) very rough, very weeded over, uncultivated and in poor condition - (i.e. dilapidated shed, 'bruck up' greenhouse etc.) 
This first Bierton Rd. allotment site visit occurred during the BT workday. Accompanying me and the BT employee "substantive C1 grade BT IT Gold User team leader supervisor" plot tenant, was BT employee steve williams. Subsequent to which, I and many other BT employees e.g Jason Jennings, tony williams, andrew ruzicKA, frank hackett, dominic destefano et al, accompanied that same BT employee "substantive C1 grade BT IT Gold User team leader supervisor" plot-holder tenant onto his No.13 allotment plot periodically - at his invite - during the BT workday c. 2001 to 2005. 
The very last occasion I went onto Bierton Rd allotment site prior to acquiring my own plot tenancy in Aug.2006 was in Oct. 2005, accompanied by BT employee John Ivey. N.B. That is a very funny story, very funny indeed. But I will not describe that - truly hilarious - allotment site visit here and now, but I will do so in a future post on this blog.#

So... to Aylesbury Thames Valley Police, to the Crown Prosecution Service, to Aylesbury Town Council, to Aylesbury Vale District Council and to whom-so-ever else it may concern - please note:
 

I transferred into HP20 2EL in June 2006. In August 2006 having settled into my new home I was missing my back garden which I had enjoyed at HP19 8JU. My sisters and my close friends suggested an allotment plot to take the place of my erstwhile back garden. Good idea I thought! and so made enquiries of AVDC, who was then the local authority allotment sites landlord.

Aug. 2006 telephone call to AVDC:

Hello, may I have an allotment plot on your Bierton Rd allotment site please? I know the site, I've been on there loads of times.
Where do you live?

Just moved into HP20 2EL.

Okay. Yes you can, but there's a waiting list.

Okay,I don't mind waiting. Can I put my name down for one please?

Do you mind taking over a plot that hasn't been looked after?

No, not at all, I'll take it and build it up meself. 

Okay I'll send the paperwork to you, but it will be an uncultivated abandoned plot?

No prob. Thanks.

Fill in the tenancy agreement and return it, okay.

Thanks, will do. Bye.

IMPORTANT FACT 1 - So please take note. 

Re: AVDC - at no stage was Colin Jarvis -  "...offered all the allotments that were available and they(he) could pick which one they(he) wanted". [sic]

Fact - I was not offered anything by the AVDC allotment site landlord. I - Colin Jarvis - was allocated a plot by AVDC. I had absolutely no control and absolutely no say over which allotment plot AVDC allocated to me in Aug.2006. OKAY! 

IMPORTANT FACT 2 - So please take note. 

I was not given "...a choice of 5 or 6 plots and chose the one next to *****". (sic) 

I would dearly love to meet any Aylesbury resident who has ever been ..offered a choice of 5 or 6 plots from which to choose (sic) - when applying for an allotment plot tenancy from either AVDC c.2006 or ATC c.2013.

ipso facto

The beginning the middle and the end in respect of the true, actual and factual circumstances surrounding my legitimate and lawful acquisition of an allotment plot tenancy from AVDC is simply this - I received in the post the allotment plot tenancy agreement which AVDC had sent to me in August 2006. I opened and read the tenancy agreement contract and read the number 16. !!!

That, I'm afraid, is as conspiratorial as it gets. Okay! Happy now?

The allotment plot which was allocated to me by A.V.D.C was a simple matter of fact, totally completely and utterly beyond my control. Okay! 

Admittedly, it was a matter of many hours before I could cease laughing at the serendipity resulting from the universal laws of 'Probability and Outcome'. Or maybe that should be the universal law of 'Poetic Justice'. Or maybe even, the universal law of 'Divine Intervention'.

Whichever the case, I'm afraid it is a matter of fact that Colin Jarvis did not choose my No.16 allotment plot on AVDCs/ATCs Bierton Rd. Allotment site. 

So please take your stupid, your pathetic, your risible, your desperate and your hilarious and sad moaning and bleating regarding allotment plot proximity and plant it on your plot(s), whether at Bierton Rd or Tring Rd - and not plant it into desperate, stupid, false and untrue CPS evidence. Evidence which is perjury and evidence which you are totally incapable of proving.  You mendacious, sad, pathetic coward.

2Bcontd....

p.s. ... go on hit it, hit it like you're knocking a black man off your granny...(sic) ...fucking gungas, drive the lot of 'em into the sea ...(sic) [at a pedestrian crossing]..how many of 'em shall I get? ...go on get owt the fuckin' way or I'll run you down...(sic) ...look Colin another fuckin' black man, fuking hell how many of y'u are there for fuck sake...(sic)

...Come the revolution, oh yeah come the revolution...(sic) 

My question is: What "revolution"(sic) is that *****y ? Exactly what "revolution"(sic) are we talking about here, are we anticipating "coming"? 

BT white manager sir...bleat bleat... 
Powliiiice sir...bleat bleat... 

That "revolution" (sic) ?

3/12/12...Now where is that fat, overgrown, retard black gunga BT employee informer of mine whom I can make use of?...(sic) [Just as I, successfully, made use of BT Colindales' TEC herman solanki c.2004/5/6/7) ] 

Colin Jarvis's revolution? I am a follower of Anonymous. I also ...do not forgive. I also ..do not forget. Therefore: Expect me.  That "revolution" !!!

See y'u next time....